A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones house. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment with a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the right placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their perspective, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times claimed, describing how The 2 men entered the water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a region affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been lined in detail via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is really a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple just endeavoring to create a loved ones dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one functions are performed based on Skilled assistance and authorised ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Paul Feely and Rene Collier Feely, which include coming into The ocean through a storm, do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to establish if the wall as created complies with setting up permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.